It’s the economy, stupid! So, what now?


It’s not whether you’re right or wrong that’s important, but how much money you make when you’re right and how much you lose when you’re wrong. — Warren Buffett






Stock market crash


A stock market crash is a sudden dramatic decline of stock prices across a significant cross-section of a stock market. Crashes are driven by panic as much as by underlying economic factors. They often follow speculative stock market bubbles.


Stock market crashes are social phenomena where external economic events combine with crowd behaviour and psychology in a positive feedback loop where selling by some market participants drives more market participants to sell. Generally speaking, crashes usually occur under the following conditions[citation needed]: a prolonged period of rising stock prices and excessive economic optimism, a market where Price to Earnings ratios exceed long-term averages, and extensive use of margin debt and leverage by market participants.


There is no numerically-specific definition of a crash but the term commonly applies to steep double-digit percentage losses in a stock market index over a period of several days. Crashes are often distinguished from bear markets by panic selling and abrupt, dramatic price declines. Bear markets are periods of declining stock market prices that are measured in months or years. While crashes are often associated with bear markets, they do not necessarily go hand in hand. The crash of 1987 for example did not lead to a bear market. Likewise, the Japanese Nikkei bear market of the 1990s occurred over several years without any notable crashes.


Wall Street Crash of 1929

The most famous crash, the Wall Street Crash of 1929, happened on October 29, 1929. The economy had been growing robustly for most of the so-called Roaring Twenties. It was a technological golden age as innovations such as radio, automobiles, aviation, telephone and the power grid were deployed and adopted. Companies who had pioneered these advances like Radio Corporation of America (RCA), and General Motors saw their stocks soar. Financial corporations also did well as Wall Street bankers floated mutual fund companies (then known as investment trusts) like the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation. Investors were infatuated with the returns available in the stock market especially with the use of leverage through margin debt. On August 24, 1921, the Dow Jones Industrial Average stood at a value of 63.9. By September 3, 1929, it had risen more than sixfold, touching 381.2. It would not regain this level for another twenty five years. By the summer of 1929, it was clear that the economy was contracting and the stock market went through a series of unsettling price declines. These declines fed investor anxiety and events soon came to a head. October 24 (known as Black Thursday) was the first in a number of increasingly shocking market drops. This was followed swiftly by Black Monday on October 28 and Black Tuesday on October 29.


On Black Tuesday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 38 points to 260, a drop of 12.8%. The deluge of selling overwhelmed the ticker tape system that normally gave investors the current prices of their shares. Telephone lines and telegraphs were clogged and were unable to cope. This information vacuum only led to more fear and panic. The technology of the New Era, much celebrated by investors previously, now served to deepen their suffering.

Black Tuesday was a day of chaos. Forced to liquidate their stocks because of margin calls, overextended investors flooded the exchange with sell orders. The glamour stocks of the age saw their values plummet. Across the two days, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 23%.


By the end of the week of November 11, the index stood at 228, a cumulative drop of 40 percent from the September high. The markets rallied in succeeding months but it would be a false recovery that led unsuspecting investors into the worst economic crisis of modern times.


Although it is popularly believed that the Crash inflicted heavy financial loss on investors during this period, the Great Depression which followed was far more terrible. While the Crash dealt a severe blow to many a stockholder’s portfolio, the Great Depression brought obliteration and bankruptcy. The Dow Jones Industrial Average would lose 89% of its value before finally bottoming out in July 1932.


The Crash of 1987 (Black Monday 1987)

The mid-1980s were a time of strong economic optimism. From August 1982 to its peak in August 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) grew from 776 to 2722. The rise in market indices for the 19 largest markets in the world averaged 296 percent during this period. The average number of shares traded on the NYSE had risen from 65 million shares to 181 million shares.


The crash on October 19, 1987, a date that is also known as Black Monday, was the climactic culmination of a market decline that had begun five days before on October 14th. The DJIA fell 3.81 percent on October 14, followed by another 4.60 percent drop on Friday October 16th. But this was nothing compared to what lay ahead when markets opened on the subsequent Monday. On Black Monday, the Dow Jones Industrials Average plummeted 508 points, losing 22.6% of its value in one day. The S&P 500 dropped 20.4%, falling from 282.7 to 225.06. The NASDAQ Composite lost only 11.3% not because of restraint on the part of sellers but because the NASDAQ market system failed. Deluged with sell orders, many stocks on the NYSE faced trading halts and delays. Of the 2,257 NYSE-listed stocks, there were 195 trading delays and halts during the day. The NASDAQ market fared much worse. Because of its reliance on a “market making” system that allowed market makers to withdraw from trading, liquidity in NASDAQ stocks dried up. Trading in many stocks encountered a pathological condition where the bid price for a stock exceeded the ask price. These “locked” conditions severely curtailed trading. On October 19th, trading in Microsoft shares on the NASDAQ lasted a total of 54 minutes.


The Crash was the greatest single-day loss that Wall Street had ever suffered in continuous trading up to that point. Between the start of trading on October 14th to the close on October 19, the DJIA lost 760 points, a decline of over 31 percent.


The 1987 Crash was a worldwide phenomenon. The FTSE 100 Index lost 10.8% on that Monday and a further 12.2% the following day. In the month of October, all major world markets declined substantially. The least affected was Austria (a fall of 11.4%) while the most affected was Hong Kong with a drop of 45.8%. Out of 23 major industrial countries, 19 had a decline greater than 20%.


Despite fears of a repeat of the 1930s Depression, the market rallied immediately after the crash, posting a record one-day gain of 102.27 the very next day and 186.64 points on Thursday October 22. It took only two years for the Dow to recover completely; by September 1989, the market had regained all of the value it had lost in the 1987 crash. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained six-tenths of a percent during the calendar year 1987.


No definitive conclusions have been reached on the reasons behind the 1987 Crash. Stocks had been in a multi-year bull run and market P/E ratios in the U.S. were above the post-war average. The S&P 500 was trading at 23 times earnings, a postwar high and well above the average of 14.5 times earnings. Herd behaviour and psychological feedback loops play a critical part in all stock market crashes but analysts have also tried to look for external triggering events. Aside from the general worries of stock market overvaluation, blame for the collapse has been apportioned to such factors as program trading, portfolio insurance and derivatives, and prior news of worsening economic indicators (i.e. a large U.S. merchandise trade deficit and a falling U.S. dollar which seemed to imply future interest rate hikes).


One of the consequences of the 1987 Crash was the introduction of the circuit breaker or trading curb on the NYSE. Based upon the idea that a cooling off period would help dissipate investor panic, these mandatory market shutdowns are triggered whenever a large pre-defined market decline occurs during the trading day.


Mathematical theory of stock market crashes

The mathematical characterisation of stock market movements has been a subject of intense interest. The conventional assumption that stock markets behave according to a random Gaussian or normal distribution is incorrect. Large movements in prices (i.e. crashes) are much more common than would be predicted in a normal distribution. Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology shows that there is evidence that the frequency of stock market crashes follow an inverse cubic power law.[6] This and other studies suggest that stock market crashes are a sign of self-organized criticality in financial markets. In 1963, Benoît Mandelbrot proposed that instead of following a strict random walk, stock price variations executed a Lévy flight. A Lévy flight is a random walk which is occasionally disrupted by large movements. In 1995, Rosario Mantegna and Gene Stanley analyzed a million records of the S&P 500 market index, calculating the returns over a five year period.[8] Their conclusion was that stock market returns are more volatile than a Gaussian distribution but less volatile than a Lévy flight.


Researchers continue to study this theory, particularly using computer simulation of crowd behaviour, and the applicability of models to reproduce crash-like phenomena. (Wiki:



Stock Market Bubble


A stock market bubble is a type of economic bubble taking place in stock markets when price of stocks rise and become overvalued by any measure of stock valuation.


The existence of stock market bubbles is at odds with the assumptions of efficient market theory which assumes rational investor behaviour. Behavioural finance theory attribute stock market bubbles to cognitive biases that lead to groupthink and herd behaviour. Bubbles occur not only in real-world markets, with their inherent uncertainty and noise, but also in highly predictable experimental markets. In the laboratory, uncertainty is eliminated and calculating the expected returns should be a simple mathematical exercise, because participants are endowed with assets that are defined to have a finite lifespan and a known probability distribution of dividends. Other theoretical explanations of stock market bubbles have suggested that they are rational, intrinsic, and contagious. (Wiki:



Short Selling or Selling Short


The selling of a security that the seller does not own, or any sale that is completed by the delivery of a security borrowed by the seller. Short sellers assume that they will be able to buy the stock at a lower amount than the price at which they sold short.


Selling short is the opposite of going long. That is, short sellers make money if the stock goes down in price.


This is an advanced trading strategy with many unique risks and pitfalls. Novice investors are advised to avoid short sales.





An investor who lacks a focused trading strategy and trades on emotion and the suggestions of others, including friends, family and financial gurus. This type of investor often makes rash investments without first determining whether these decisions are financially viable. The behaviour of sheep contrasts with that of bulls and bears, who have focused views about the market.


Like a sheep, this type of investor is a follower, relying on a shepherd for guidance. These shepherds can come in the form of financial pundits or the latest trend or market story.


Sheep-like investors are often the last to get in on a major market move, such as the tech boom of the late ’90s, because they base their investments on what is being talked about the most. Many experts believe that sheep-like investors are the most likely to sustain investment losses because they have no clear investment strategy.




What were the factors causing the 1987 crash? “A large U.S. merchandise trade deficit and a falling U.S. dollar.”


What are the factors causing this stock market “correction?” (LOL! — that’s what the administration is calling it.) It doesn’t take an economist to figure that out, does it? The same thing has happened here and now. We have a large trade deficit. Why? Part of the problem, IMHO, is that we no longer make tangible goods as the primary means of income, we have become an information services society. The only thing we have to trade is paper (financial products like stock, currency, etc.) and services. Globalization has moved industries that manufacture tangible goods to areas where cheap labor is available, and, given the lack of jobs and low living expenses in third-world countries, that is not us. And the real concern is that our services industry, which was going well because we used to be the leaders in technology, is also going to Asia (India, especially). This industrial and services shift to other countries also means we are no longer self-sufficient. We cannot close our borders and just take care of ourselves. We have lost the steel industry to Japan, the car industry to Asia, the IT industry to India and other parts of Asia and food production to South America. Toys and clothes now come from China.


So, how do we change this trade imbalance? What can we do to stimulate our economy and provide a “saleable” product to trade with?


Green Technology is the answer. We are not in front of the curve on this, either. Brazil has already converted to methanol. Japan has already developed a hydrogen fuel cell car, although it is still not cost-effective. Windmills have been around for quite a while now, and although they used to be used to grind grain into flour, etc., many countries have developed win technology. So we must get off our asses and get busy.


Hydrogen fuel cells provide the best source of green energy that will be kind to our environment. Solar and wind energy can provide considerable “free” sources of energy to light and heat homes with electricity.


And we have all this coal in the ground. We must figure out a way to convert coal to clean (or cleaner) energy that can be distributed more easily (liquefication). In the meantime, we have an abundance of natural gas that would provide a cleaner energy resource for fuelling vehicles. This would remedy our immediate dependence on foreign oil.


There are so many reasons why we need to get this green economy going in a big way. We need a Manhattan Project-level effort, with leadership and subsidies from our government, to get us moving. The subsidies could be tax breaks rather than actual money allocated, since we really don’t need to take on more debt (and that is what would happen, since we are operating on a deficit already).


The other situation we need to correct our financial mess is to get serious about our national debt. We cannot continue to borrow money from the Chinese and Saudis and expect to keep living “high” as if we were “flush” with cash. Hard times are ahead, and we must face them with resolve, commitment and courage.


And we must end the war in Iraq, which is draining us of our resources and creating more debt. The Iraqis have over $70B in assets now. Why can’t they rebuild their own country? Why do we have to pay for it? I realize that we caused much of the destruction, but it seems unreasonable given our economic situation that we should be totally responsible for all the reconstruction.


Whatever package the Congress finally comes up with, it must not be a bailout to private industry that allows for CEOs who mismanaged their companies into this mess to leave with “golden parachutes” (severance or retirement packages worth millions of dollars). And I would even suggest that all those BILLIONS of dollars of bonuses given out last year to investment managers should be recovered, at least in part. The taxpayers did not create this mess, and it is unreasonable to make us have to bail private industries out because of mismanagement, fraud and abuse. These executives and managers should be held accountable for their actions financially, as well as via criminal prosecution.


About Laura Schneider

Retired IT consultant (disabled), musician and animal lover. I support the constitutional concept of Right of Privacy and no discrimination against any person based on race, religion, ideology, gender, sexual preference or disability. I am very concerned about the erosion of our constitutional rights and protections under GWB (and even this administration). I strongly oppose torture, rendition or illegal search and/or seizure (without a warrant) and warrantless wiretapping. I believe that education is our best hope of a bright future for our children. Knowledge is power, and that's the kind of authority (Biblically speaking) that our children must have in order to be successful in a 21st century world.
This entry was posted in economy, leadership and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to It’s the economy, stupid! So, what now?

  1. You failed to mention that it was a veto-proof REPUBLICAN congressional vote that assured the passage of financial institution deregulation in 1996, AND that it was engineered by Phil Graham, the current “economic adviser” for John McCain.

    Look up the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

    I don’t claim to understand it all, but what the hell?!!!
    Don’t you get this tremendously awful feeling we are being hoodwinked? (Again!)

    Who got us into this mess?
    Who’s paying? (well, that one I can answer)
    Who gets the money?
    How do we ensure it is spent correctly?
    How do we get our money back?
    Who’s head will/should roll?

  2. Pingback: It’s the economy, bstupid/b! So, what now? | WTF - When There Is Nothing More To Say

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s